<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PABP != PCI Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/02/02/pabp-pci-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/02/02/pabp-pci-compliance/</link>
	<description>David D. Bergert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heartland Payment Systems Breach - My Thoughts &#124; Payment Systems Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/02/02/pabp-pci-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartland Payment Systems Breach - My Thoughts &#124; Payment Systems Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/?p=6#comment-846</guid>
		<description>[...] 30th, 2008) If they were PCI compliant how did a breach occur ? It is important to note (again, and again) that Compliance != Security. Compliance is a snapshot in time, PCI is not based on an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 30th, 2008) If they were PCI compliant how did a breach occur ? It is important to note (again, and again) that Compliance != Security. Compliance is a snapshot in time, PCI is not based on an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/02/02/pabp-pci-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/?p=6#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the link.  It&#039;s important to remember that PABP (now the PA-DSS) is meant to &#039;enable&#039; compliance but not act as magic pixie dust to bring compliance for all.

That being said, using compliant payment applications can and will have a large impact on the security of Level 3 and 4 merchants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the link.  It&#8217;s important to remember that PABP (now the PA-DSS) is meant to &#8216;enable&#8217; compliance but not act as magic pixie dust to bring compliance for all.</p>
<p>That being said, using compliant payment applications can and will have a large impact on the security of Level 3 and 4 merchants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
