<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Batch vs. Real-Time Processing in e-commerce environments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/</link>
	<description>David D. Bergert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 04:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Chesko</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Chesko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Great post, you put it clear enough I was able to follow your thoughts.  Based on db and BJR&#039;s comments I&#039;m assuming a mixed approach isn&#039;t standard practice?  If its not, why not?  I love how you illustrate the bottom line- customer checkout experience.  Our jobs are to ensure that their experience is as seamless as possible, loved how you wrapped it all up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, you put it clear enough I was able to follow your thoughts.  Based on db and BJR&#8217;s comments I&#8217;m assuming a mixed approach isn&#8217;t standard practice?  If its not, why not?  I love how you illustrate the bottom line- customer checkout experience.  Our jobs are to ensure that their experience is as seamless as possible, loved how you wrapped it all up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>db</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wouldn’t a mix of both be a better approach?&quot;  With this I would be concerned with the time involved before determining the failure - and customer will wait until the request times-out or returns an error code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wouldn’t a mix of both be a better approach?&#8221;  With this I would be concerned with the time involved before determining the failure &#8211; and customer will wait until the request times-out or returns an error code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJR</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>BJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t a mix of both be a better approach? Use real time auths and if a real time auth fails, then instead of relaying a failure message to the consumer, the merchant could retry the auth at a later time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a mix of both be a better approach? Use real time auths and if a real time auth fails, then instead of relaying a failure message to the consumer, the merchant could retry the auth at a later time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batch Transactions</title>
		<link>http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Batch Transactions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paymentsystemsblog.com/2008/12/17/batch-vs-real-time-processing-in-e-commerce-environments/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Good post. Batch processing is also good for legacy applications that generate a comma separated value file or CSV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Batch processing is also good for legacy applications that generate a comma separated value file or CSV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
